Do you like art that makes you uncomfortable?
Posted on June 17 2012, with 385 Notes
furia6666777788889999 answered:
Yes, definitely. Particularly if it is with good purpose.
oneofgodsprototypes answered:
ABSOLUTELY. if it doesnt break the comfort zone it is nothing worth noticing. In Art You must walk the
line of insanity and genius
darkcloudsbrightskies answered:
Oh, yes. It’s a fundamental function of art, as far as I’m concerned; also comforting, consoling,
startling, informing, displaying, et alia.
- trvekvlts answered: yes. very much.
- meteoritic answered: yes. just because it makes you uncomfortable doesn’t mean you should dislike it. any emotional response=art
sapphoscoming liked this
- naadsat reblogged this from cavetocanvas
lukespencersanchez answered:
yes
momacelli answered:
Yes
- 2-crowes answered: no
a-hallucination answered:
always
distantwilderness answered:
Yes, but I don’t like it in my house.
- moonsauce answered: Yes, if it makes me uncomfortable in an aesthetic way or in a morally confusing way. But there is a line and it depends on how well it’s done
justement answered:
sure
- alesass answered: I don’t hate it…
mrstruggan-blog answered:
This question is sitting in Mr. Struggan’s dashboard above a photo compilation of Nicholas Cage’s face
photoshopped on cats. So, no.
- dictamebloc answered: definitely! (especially when the main goal was not making me uncomfortable) although it does not have to make me feel that way, obviously.
poboh answered:
never!
oxidizeandrearrange answered:
Absolutely
nurify answered:
sometimes
- sedatory answered: yeah. but then the spook…
- danainn answered: yes!
justchickenscratch answered:
Rarely. Thought provoking…yes, disturbing…no.
- bloodedlilyofthevalley answered: no
- amelliachung liked this
whatahoot liked this
- 0bludagengs answered: if that piece of art makes me think, yes. why not.
- lelandoification-blog answered: Art should provide me some sort of emotional response regardless of comfort. I prefer art that makes me go “ew. whats that all about?”
tinykitchenstories answered:
Though I agree that art is supposed to challenge people, I dislike the notion that art must provoke.
Subtlety speaks eloquently.
heidihelmy liked this
- thewisdomofsilenus answered: yes, of course
- chambrayandcurls answered: I don’t know whether I’d say I like it, but I can appreciate it
ladydilettanti answered:
yes
jamesbedell answered:
yes! Art should make you think. Sometimes, that means getting uncomfortable.
pikse answered:
I do! I especially enjoy body horror.
- drunkenst3v3 answered: Yes, because it is a different expression that can bring about a new extreme change in thinking and that is like a mimi revolution.
deepseadumpsterdiver liked this
doctom666 answered:
yes!! “GUERNICA” comes to mind!!
izzys-adoration answered:
Yes, because of how thought provoking it is.
- themoronsaface answered: hell yeah
mordanes answered:
yes, that’s what it’s for. to make you think
rainbow-blight answered:
yes, and i like creating art that makes others uncomfortable and anxious. boundaries: break ‘em down.
cavetocanvas posted this
- Show more notes